A senior, two-engineer technical practice. We cut server costs by 50%+ moving steady workloads off AWS, build modern app and agent workflows for operators, and act as the technical operator behind web3 developer programs.
For mature platforms with real cloud spend, we routinely find 50%+ infrastructure savings when steady workloads are moved off AWS into bare-metal or hybrid setups — but only where the workload, uptime requirements, and operational risk make sense.
We never promise guaranteed savings before reviewing your billing and architecture. Diagnostic first; recommendation second; execution only where the numbers and risk profile justify it.
Request an AWS cost review →Modern customer portals, mobile-first internal tools, booking and quote flows, support triage, and intake automation — wired into the systems your team already uses. Not a fresh coat of paint. A working MVP with real backend behaviour.
Agents propose, draft, summarize and route. Sensitive actions stay approval-based unless you explicitly want full automation. Auth, audit logs, backups, and runbooks ship with every build.
Scope a workflow MVP →For protocol foundations, ecosystem funds, grant programs and accelerators: senior technical execution that crosses code, infra, product and developer relations. We act as the technical layer behind your program — so non-technical staff have credible answers and builder teams have someone who can actually unblock them.
Direct experience across multiple blockchain ecosystems — developer relations, grant programs, wallet and account flows, indexing, RPC and node infrastructure, and cloud-to-bare-metal migration for web3 infrastructure.
Talk about your program →// process
We sell trust, seniority, and technical judgment — not staffing hours. Every engagement starts with a small, clearly scoped piece of work so you can assess capability and value before committing to anything larger.
Read-only access, billing exports, architecture walkthrough, workflow audit, or codebase review — depending on the engagement. Output: a written read of where you actually are.
$ sm diagnose --scope=infra → cost map · placement matrix · risk register
A specific, risk-rated proposal: what to do, what not to do, expected outcome, and the smallest safe first step. Conservative, likely, and aggressive scenarios.
$ sm plan --risk=conservative → target architecture · 30/60/90 plan · savings model
Phased execution with rollback, monitoring, and runbooks. Senior hands on the work — no junior handoffs, no agency layers, no waiting through escalation chains.
$ sm execute --wave=1 --rollback=ready → workloads migrated · monitoring active · zero downtime
Verified outcomes, documented runbooks, monitoring dashboards, and a follow-up backlog. You leave more capable than when we started.
$ sm handoff --runbooks --dashboards → verified outcomes · documented · trained internal team
// capability surface
Three offers. One team. Senior coverage across infrastructure, product and developer-facing technical work — picked deliberately around what we execute well, not what is fashionable.
// the team
Intentionally lean. The people you talk to are the people doing the work. Australia · Philippines · global delivery.
Leads engagements end-to-end. Sits across discovery, scoping, and the commercial shape of every piece of work we take on.
Owns deep technical execution — infrastructure, backend systems, and the rescue work that defines our practice.
// start a conversation
Tell us what is broken, blocked, or unclear — or what you are hoping to build. We respond personally within one business day, and we are happy to start with a small, clearly scoped piece of work.